Quote:
Quote susan53  (C) is definitely out. When a negative or limiting adverb is moved to the front of the clause, then there must be inversion of operator |
Thank you, can we say here "there must be AN inversion of operator(no article before operator as it serves this function as we've(you've ) already explained before). wouldn't it be more correct? This looks like a specific instance to me because it happens in this specific case