Schwa sound in main verbs that also function as auxiliary verbs.
 

Dear members and teachers:

As to my knowledge, Schwa sound does not occur in verbs unless they are auxiliary verbs in a sentence. I would like to know why sometimes the verb TO BE is reduced to Schwa, even though it is acting as main verb. I find that TO BE is reduced to Schwa in these sentences.

a) I am happy to hear about he. /əm/

b) They were in the city for a tour. /wər/

c) She was the first to know it. /wəz/

d) You are an English and Spanish teacher. /ər/

1) In which cases does the verb TO BE have to be reduced to Schwa sound when it is not an auxiliary verb?

Hoping for you assitance and help in this matter.

Re: Schwa sound in main verbs that also function as auxiliary verbs.
 

No. The schwa occurs in unstressed syllables - the word type is irrelevant. For example, I've just used the verb main "occurs" : /ə'kɜ:z/

Some others : remember -/rɪmembə/; understand -/ʌndəstænd/; correct - /kərekt/ etc

Compare the two pronunciations of "was" in the following sentence :

She was there and he was too : /ʃi: wəz 'ðeə ən hi: 'wɒz 'tu:/

"was" is the main verb in each clause - but what decides the pronunciation is whether or not it's stressed. in unstressed position the weak form /wəz/ is used, and in stressed positions the strong form /wɒz/

Usually, as an auxiliary verb, Be occurs in unstressed position and it's therefore usually reduced. But that doesn't mean it can't occur in stressed position. Again, compare the two pronunciations of "was" in the following sentence, where it's used as an auxiliary. The first time it's unstressed and therefore reduced, the second it's stressed and therefore the strong form is used :

She said she was going and he said he was too : /ʃi: 'sed ʃi: wəz 'gəʊwɪŋ ən hi: 'sed hi: 'wɒz tu:/

Reduction doesn't always mean the schwa though. For example, "he" and "she" in this sentence, which occur in unstressed position, might well be reduced to /ʃɪ/ and /hɪ/. And the present form of the verb Be is more usually contracted, so that the vowel is omitted completely, rather than reduced to a schwa. A typical transcription of your sentences might be :

a) I'm happy to hear about her. /aɪm 'hæpɪ tə 'hɪə r ə'baʊt ə/

b) They were in the city for a tour /ðeɪ wə r ɪn ðə 'sɪtɪ fə r ə 'tʊə/

c) She was the first to know it. /ʃi: wəz ðə 'fɜ:s tə 'nəʊ w ɪt/

d) You're a teacher of English and Spanish. /jʊə r ə 'ti:ʧə r əv 'ɪŋglɪʃ ən 'spænɪʃ/

(The linking consonants should really be typed in subscript - ie smaller and lower than the others - but the site won't let me do it)

Re: Schwa sound in main verbs that also function as auxiliary verbs.
 

Thank you Susan53 : You're pretty good at giving explanation!

I'm a native Spanish speaker from Santo Domingo, Dominicana Republic. I began to study phonetics on june 2013, in my country pronunciation is more american accent due to the geografical position.

Are you a linguist?

Re: Schwa sound in main verbs that also function as auxiliary verbs.
 

Just a teacher :)

Re: Schwa sound in main verbs that also function as auxiliary verbs.
 

You're just not a teacher; you're a very good teacher.