'for' as a conjunction to mean 'because', archaic? - English Questions - eslHQ

View today's posts

Previous Post

Next Post

#3 (permalink)

Unread

Jan 25th, 2010, 01:51 am

mesmark is offline

eslHQ superstar!

Join Date: Mar 27th, 2005

Location: Japan

Posts: 1,693

mesmark is on a distinguished road

Default

Re: 'for' as a conjunction to mean 'because', archaic?

Sue - thanks! That certainly helps.

At the time I told her that I felt it didn't really match the style for I felt it a bit formal

I'll relay the rest next week.

Thanks again for taking the time to bounce this around.

- Mark

Share
- Share this post on
- Digg
- Del.icio.us
- Technorati
- Twitter

__________________
flashcards | ESL games online | vocabulary worksheets | certificate templates | phonics worksheets

Reply With Quote

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Find the Best TEFL, TESL, TESOL & CELTA Certification Courses - User Submitted Ratings & Reviews for Online, Distance & Abroad TEFL Courses. Over 3,500 reviews of 100+ TEFL schools!

Teach English in Thailand - Onsite and Combined TEFL certification courses in Phuket, Thailand.

Free ESL Flashcards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 pm.

All materials from this website are for classroom-use only. Digital redistribution of materials, in part or in whole, is strictly forbidden!